Wednesday, November 24, 2010

Luka's Lister Boom

For anyone interested in the merits or otherwise of Luka's boom I present the following. Be warned, it was done in about 10 mins while I was having lunch at work so it is a bit simplified...

150kg vertical leech load
100 diameter thin wall steel boom
10mm round bar steel vang
20ish mm round bar "spreader"
2.5m boom
400mm gooseneck to vang take-off

Conventional Boom


Bending Moment


Deflection = 14.5mm


Luka Boom Arrangement


Bending Moment


Deflection = 13.2mm

A little over a tonne of tension in the vang in the conventional arrangement and a little under a tonne for the Luka setup.

Is it worth the complexity?

13 comments:

  1. Sounds like a good NA-type talk:

    Moths: are they worth the complexity?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Lucky the states aren't at easter, hate to try and fit under that in a light wind race when you start going into windward.

    ReplyDelete
  3. You missed the point that the attachment point of the vang is further aft on the boom than normal so the bending moment for the same leach load is substantially less, or more likely the moment is the same for more leach load without breaking the boom.
    Moving the attachment point act with a regular vang flattens the angle and adds to local stresses due to higher compression loads on the boom.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Yep missed the critical bit
    Conventional vang BP is at about 650mm from GN pin
    Spreader vang BP is at 1100mm from GN (at bridle point)
    Hence a lot less vang load required to achieve the same leech tension

    ReplyDelete
  5. Also another critical point. Boat is designed to take the extra load. I am pretty sure this would void any production boat warranty.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Ha ha pwnd! Sux to be smart and wrong

    ReplyDelete
  7. screw you markla!

    agreed it is a slightly stiffer arrangement with same vang attachment position on boom.

    agreed it is stiffer with a long vang attachment position on boom, which this extra angle allows.

    disagree with "a lot less vang load". it is significantly affected by the boom length and king post length, which doesn't appear to change between setups. the slight change in angle has minimal effect on the vang loads.

    bit of an argument about the vang loads. can't be "a lot less vang load" and "designed to take the extra load". the load directions change slightly at the gooseneck and king post, and their magnitude is slightly different.

    ReplyDelete
  8. The loads all depend how much you are prepared to pull the rope, and what your original intention was.

    ReplyDelete
  9. are you saying the current setup cannot achieve enough vang load?

    or

    are you saying Luka has a different rig setup that requires more vang load?

    ReplyDelete
  10. Or are you saying that luka is a pussy and needs a setup that lets his weak pretty boy hands effectivly pull more vang on.

    ReplyDelete
  11. hahahaha!!!

    I would never say that.

    ReplyDelete
  12. title amended, credit where credit is due

    ReplyDelete
  13. Thinking of putting a kink into my straight boom and adding a vang. What factors affect the decision on vang position on the boom and vang strut length?

    ReplyDelete