
karl mentioned on my last post that he thought aluminium would outperform carbon for gantries. I produced the above graph comparing the strength and cost of tubes of carbon, stainless, aluminium and titanium. The catch is only readily available sections were used. The metal tubes were sourced from http://www.onlinemetals.com and carbon came from http://www.carbonfibreexpress.com/.
Each type of tube has two columns. The first is the buckling strength of a length 550mm long (I mentioned in an earlier post that the minimum value for this parameter is 350kg). The second column is the cost of 2475mm of tubes (approx what you need for a gantry). The bottom axis is the weight of the 550mm long tube.
Filament wound carbon tube is the clear winner from the list. The tube pultrusion is next. I am sure I was told pultrusion has off axis material however I think for the marginal cost saving I would still go with the filament wound carbon - a little more robust.
First aluminium comes in at 50% more weight, but that only has a 0.9mm wall. You would probably only be able to glue such tubes together into sockets as the wall is so thin. However it is CHEAP!!! $25 for all the tubes you require. And just as strong as the carbon.
I always struggle to find an application for titanium (outside of high temperature/corrosive environments). This shows it has very similar strength and cost as the carbon, however its high density (4.51g/cc) makes it twice the weight of carbon, even with 50% less wall thickness. Stainless doesn't even get a look in before 3x weight. Rather cheap tho.
I am a little disappointed to see how far along the list my gantry is. But I am told bladerider uses 20x1.6 aluminium so I am slightly lighter than them. If anyone else wants to divulge what they use I will mark them on the graph above too.







